

As of August 24, 2026, an amendment to Amazon’s Business Solutions Agreement (BSA) is effective, expanding restrictions on what sellers can do with their contractual rights and obligations.
The change matters most for businesses involved in:
The key change is in Section 18. Amazon previously restricted assignment of the BSA without its prior written consent. The updated language goes further by expressly prohibiting sellers from assigning or pledging all or part of their rights or obligations under, or arising from, the agreement. (Amazon Seller Central)
That distinction is important.
It's a change to the contract governing the seller-Amazon relationship.
And for sellers using Amazon revenue as part of their financing structure, it's something worth reviewing immediately.
The old BSA already said sellers could not assign the agreement without Amazon's prior written consent.
The August 24 amendment expands the restriction.
The updated language now addresses two separate concepts:
The restriction is no longer limited to transferring the agreement itself.
It now expressly covers all or part of a seller's rights or obligations under or arising from the BSA. (Amazon Seller Central)
The amended language separately prohibits sellers from pledging their BSA rights or obligations as collateral.
That is particularly relevant to financing arrangements involving Amazon proceeds.
Amazon's published explanation says the change is intended to reduce risks involving duplicate payments, payment delays, and payment failures. (Amazon Seller Central)
At first glance, this can look like a technical contract revision.
For some Amazon businesses, it isn't.
Consider a seller that uses a financing facility where Amazon-related proceeds or rights to receive Amazon disbursements are part of the lender's collateral package.
The seller may still be the account owner.
The lender may never operate Seller Central.
But the financing documents may nevertheless grant the lender rights connected to Amazon proceeds.
That is exactly the type of structure that deserves review under the new BSA language.
"Do I have a business loan?"
It's:
That distinction can materially change the analysis.
Not quite.
This is an important point that deserves more nuance than many headlines provide.
Amazon already required written consent for assignment of the BSA. The new amendment broadens the language to cover rights and obligations under the agreement and expressly addresses pledging. (Amazon Seller Central)
So sellers shouldn't interpret the update as:
"You can no longer sell your Amazon business."
A better interpretation is:
You should not assume that you can privately transfer Amazon-related contractual rights, account control, or proceeds without addressing Amazon's requirements.
A business acquisition can involve many different legal assets:
Those aren't necessarily interchangeable.
The financing issue is potentially more urgent than the acquisition issue for many sellers.
Revenue-based financing and similar arrangements can be structured in different ways.
Some may involve:
Not every financing agreement is necessarily affected in the same way.
That's why sellers should not simply assume:
"My lender takes a percentage of sales, so I'm automatically in violation."
Nor should they assume:
"Amazon isn't a party to my loan agreement, so the BSA doesn't matter."
The correct approach is to review the actual financing documents against the current BSA.
The timing of the amendment is particularly significant.
August is when many Amazon businesses are finalizing:
A financing structure that looked normal earlier in the year may now require another look if it involves Amazon-related rights or proceeds.
Review the structure first.
If your lender is repaid from a percentage of Amazon-generated proceeds, review the agreement.
Look specifically for language involving:
Some merchant cash advances are structured around future receivables or sales.
That doesn't automatically mean every MCA is prohibited.
But if Amazon-related rights are part of the collateral or assignment structure, the arrangement deserves professional review.
If Amazon-related receivables have been sold or assigned to another party, review the arrangement carefully.
The amended BSA specifically addresses assignment and pledging of rights under or arising from the agreement. (Amazon Seller Central)
If you've purchased an Amazon business or are currently negotiating an acquisition, determine:
If your company recently:
review the relationship between the legal entity and the Amazon account.
Buyers and sellers should review Amazon-related contractual rights during due diligence—not after signing the purchase agreement.
Include Amazon-specific questions in the transaction checklist.
If you're borrowing specifically to purchase holiday inventory, review the collateral and repayment structure before drawing additional funds.
If any of the situations above apply to you, don't panic.
Instead, follow a structured review.
Collect:
Look for terms such as:
Amazon
marketplace proceeds
Amazon receivables
future receivables
sales proceeds
payment rights
security interest
assignment
pledge
collateral
Amazon disbursements
This isn't a substitute for legal review.
It's simply a way to identify which documents deserve attention.
The question is:
If you're unsure, don't guess.
Have qualified counsel review both documents together.
Ask:
If the structure creates a potential conflict, don't wait for a problem.
Ask whether the facility can be restructured around alternative collateral or guarantees that don't involve prohibited Amazon-related rights.
Potential alternatives might include, depending on the lender and transaction:
For an ownership or corporate restructuring, keep documentation organized.
Depending on the situation, this can include:
If Amazon requires documentation, provide accurate information that matches the actual business structure.
The amendment also changes the due-diligence conversation for buyers.
Previously, an acquisition checklist might focus heavily on:
Now add:
Before closing, ask:
Who owns the Amazon-related rights?
Who operates the account?
What financing arrangements are attached to those rights?
Does any lender have rights involving Amazon proceeds?
What Amazon approvals or processes are required?
This can prevent a transaction from becoming operationally messy after closing.
The takeaway isn't:
It's:
A business can have perfectly legitimate financing while still needing to review whether the collateral package interacts with Amazon's contractual restrictions.
That's why sellers should separate two questions:
Do we need financing?
Does the financing structure comply with the contracts governing our Amazon business?
Both need to be answered.
This is where sellers should be particularly careful.
If you signed a financing agreement before August 24, don't assume the old contract automatically makes the arrangement acceptable under the amended BSA.
At the same time, don't assume the financing is automatically invalid simply because it involves Amazon revenue.
The interaction between a private financing contract, the amended BSA, and applicable secured-transactions law can be fact-specific.
This article is a business/compliance guide, not legal advice. Sellers with meaningful financing exposure should have their lender documents reviewed by qualified counsel.
Use this quick checklist:
At Adorbix, we see account compliance as part of the broader Amazon growth system.
A seller can have:
Excellent PPC
Strong SEO
High conversion
Great reviews
Healthy revenue
—and still face a major business problem if the underlying account structure isn't managed correctly.
That's why our approach connects four areas:
Monitor:
↓
Review:
↓
Understand:
↓
Scale:
The August 24 BSA change sits at the intersection of account management, financing, operations, and growth.
Adorbix can help sellers approach the Amazon side of that equation through:
Identify account-level risks before they become larger operational problems.
Review listings, content, claims, and catalog structure for potential issues.
Connect compliance considerations with PPC, SEO, conversion, and profitability decisions.
Understand how financing, Amazon fees, advertising, inventory, and product economics affect your actual margins.
For brands going through ownership or operating-entity changes, help map the Amazon-side operational requirements and coordinate the right internal stakeholders.
For legal interpretation of a financing contract, acquisition agreement, or BSA provision, work with qualified legal counsel.
The August 24 amendment does not simply mean that every sale of an Amazon business is prohibited. However, sellers cannot assume they can privately transfer Amazon contractual rights or obligations without addressing Amazon's requirements. The BSA already required Amazon's written consent for assignment, and the new language expands the restriction to rights and obligations under or arising from the agreement. (Amazon Seller Central)
The BSA change does not mean Amazon sellers cannot borrow money.
The important issue is how the financing is structured and whether it assigns or pledges rights or obligations covered by the BSA.
Have the actual financing documents reviewed if Amazon-related proceeds or rights are part of the collateral.
Not necessarily.
The answer depends on the actual contractual structure, including what rights are assigned or pledged and how the financing is documented.
Don't rely on the label "RBF" alone.
The BSA amendment expanded the restriction from assigning the agreement itself to also expressly prohibiting assignment or pledging of all or part of a seller's rights or obligations under or arising from the agreement. (Amazon Seller Central)
Amazon's published explanation says the change is intended to reduce risks involving duplicate payments, payment delays, and payment failures. (Amazon Seller Central)
Pull the financing documents, identify any assignment or security-interest provisions involving Amazon-related proceeds or rights, and have the arrangement reviewed by qualified legal counsel and your lender.
Potentially. If your Q4 inventory financing involves Amazon-related rights or disbursements as collateral, the structure deserves immediate review.
Amazon's August 24 BSA amendment is easy to dismiss as a technical contract update.
For the right seller, it isn't.
The change reaches areas that can sit underneath the Amazon business:
Financing.
Ownership.
Account structure.
Amazon proceeds.
Q4 working capital.
The most important distinction is that Amazon's update expands the existing assignment restriction and expressly adds a prohibition on pledging rights or obligations under the BSA. It should not be reduced to the headline "Amazon has banned selling businesses" or "all Amazon loans are now illegal." The actual contract language and the structure of each transaction matter. (Amazon Seller Central)
So if your business has:
Don't wait until Q4 inventory is sitting in a warehouse.
Don't wait until an acquisition has already closed.
And don't wait until a financing issue becomes an Amazon account issue.
At Adorbix, we help sellers connect account health, compliance, PPC, SEO, listing optimization, profitability, and growth strategy so Amazon isn't treated as just another sales channel.
Important: This article is for business and educational purposes and is not legal advice. Because the effect of the amended BSA can depend on the exact financing, ownership, and corporate structure involved, sellers should have material arrangements reviewed by qualified counsel.